RobotChickens wrote:

I come with good news!
We have a development! (of some kind)
Read this thread on a ST profile: https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/users/codubee/#comments-284192102

Mozboz wrote:

RobotChickens wrote:

I come with good news!
We have a development! (of some kind)
Read this thread on a ST profile: https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/users/codubee/#comments-284192102

Great! We're getting places.

sonic__fan wrote:

(#2004)

Mozboz wrote:

RobotChickens wrote:

I come with good news!
We have a development! (of some kind)
Read this thread on a ST profile: https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/users/codubee/#comments-284192102

Great! We're getting places.

Nice, we're making some progress.

codube wrote:

(comment)
If you feel that strongly about it, the underlying code is open source, you can add it and then request that your code be merged into the editor on the site.

codube wrote:

(comment)
Just because a pull request is submitted does not mean that we agree with merging it into the main-line source. Many times fixes that are submitted do not do the fix in a way that is sustainable/workable across many browsers, etc…

USBGamepad wrote:

sonic__fan wrote:

(#2004)

Mozboz wrote:

RobotChickens wrote:

I come with good news!
We have a development! (of some kind)
Read this thread on a ST profile: https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/users/codubee/#comments-284192102

Great! We're getting places.

Nice, we're making some progress.

codube wrote:

(comment)
If you feel that strongly about it, the underlying code is open source, you can add it and then request that your code be merged into the editor on the site.

codube wrote:

(comment)
Just because a pull request is submitted does not mean that we agree with merging it into the main-line source. Many times fixes that are submitted do not do the fix in a way that is sustainable/workable across many browsers, etc…

So, @codube is basically saying that we need to code it ourselves, and there's only a slight chance of the pull request even getting accepted because it's from the community. This seems to answer our question; the ST isn't working on this themselves and doesn't plan to either. However, we are allowed to work on it ourselves if we like. To me, this seems like a green light to begin development!

Mozboz wrote:

(#2006)

USBGamepad wrote:

sonic__fan wrote:

(#2004)

Mozboz wrote:

RobotChickens wrote:

I come with good news!
We have a development! (of some kind)
Read this thread on a ST profile: https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/users/codubee/#comments-284192102

Great! We're getting places.

Nice, we're making some progress.

codube wrote:

(comment)
If you feel that strongly about it, the underlying code is open source, you can add it and then request that your code be merged into the editor on the site.

codube wrote:

(comment)
Just because a pull request is submitted does not mean that we agree with merging it into the main-line source. Many times fixes that are submitted do not do the fix in a way that is sustainable/workable across many browsers, etc…

So, @codube is basically saying that we need to code it ourselves, and there's only a slight chance of the pull request even getting accepted because it's from the community. This seems to answer our question; the ST isn't working on this themselves and doesn't plan to either. However, we are allowed to work on it ourselves if we like. To me, this seems like a green light to begin development!

Hey, new account? Is this someone who's been talking making a special account? Plus, this might be the end of what I can do to help, if anyone's wondering. I have no idea how to code in whatever they use for Scratch? ???? Why did I use three question marks? Actually now it's four.

Mozboz wrote:

USBGamepad wrote:

sonic__fan wrote:

(#2004)

Mozboz wrote:

RobotChickens wrote:

I come with good news!
We have a development! (of some kind)
Read this thread on a ST profile: https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/users/codubee/#comments-284192102

Great! We're getting places.

Nice, we're making some progress.

codube wrote:

(comment)
If you feel that strongly about it, the underlying code is open source, you can add it and then request that your code be merged into the editor on the site.

codube wrote:

(comment)
Just because a pull request is submitted does not mean that we agree with merging it into the main-line source. Many times fixes that are submitted do not do the fix in a way that is sustainable/workable across many browsers, etc…

So, @codube is basically saying that we need to code it ourselves, and there's only a slight chance of the pull request even getting accepted because it's from the community. This seems to answer our question; the ST isn't working on this themselves and doesn't plan to either. However, we are allowed to work on it ourselves if we like. To me, this seems like a green light to begin development!

Hey, new account? Is this someone who's been talking making a special account? Plus, this might be the end of what I can do to help, if anyone's wondering. I have no idea how to code in whatever they use for Scratch? ???? Why did I use three question marks? Actually now it's four.

creeperyeettt wrote:

why dont we ask sheeptester he already has a working gamepad extension/addon for scratch

1RocK0StaR1 wrote:

(#2012)
I sort of support this, but it could cause some scratchers to need a controller to play certain games. If they made it so that you would need to have keyboard support, then I would FULL support.

mumu245 wrote:

It's been 6 years already, fix the title!

Mozboz wrote:

(#2015)

mumu245 wrote:

It's been 6 years already, fix the title!

We can't, the guy who can do that is inactive.

mumu245 wrote:

It's been 6 years already, fix the title!

sonic__fan wrote:

mumu245 wrote:

It's been 6 years already, fix the title!

Why does the title need fixing? It looks fine to me.

crawfishcode wrote:

(#2018)

sonic__fan wrote:

mumu245 wrote:

It's been 6 years already, fix the title!

Why does the title need fixing? It looks fine to me.

Yeah, I don't see anything wrong with it.

RobotChickens wrote:

crawfishcode wrote:

(#2018)

sonic__fan wrote:

mumu245 wrote:

It's been 6 years already, fix the title!

Why does the title need fixing? It looks fine to me.

Yeah, I don't see anything wrong with it.

The current title is exclusive to USB Controllers when it should just be Gamepads to include other connection types (because it doesn't matter) and also other gamepad form factors besides controllers (again because it doesn't matter what kind it is)

sonic__fan wrote:

RobotChickens wrote:

crawfishcode wrote:

(#2018)

sonic__fan wrote:

mumu245 wrote:

It's been 6 years already, fix the title!

Why does the title need fixing? It looks fine to me.

Yeah, I don't see anything wrong with it.

The current title is exclusive to USB Controllers when it should just be Gamepads to include other connection types (because it doesn't matter) and also other gamepad form factors besides controllers (again because it doesn't matter what kind it is)

Ah, ok.