Voxalice wrote:

Snip

That was one word out of hundreds. I thought the review was amazing and that he deserves to be specialist.
edit: 701st post and page king :O

miagupta wrote:

bananaandchoc1 wrote:

^

ipaddude wrote:

MossMapping wrote:

snip snop
Yay
Are you even a member?

maybe the public thing

No that’s my alt a and I’m not good at quoting

Exactly what I said, you messed up the quoting.

ContourLines wrote:

miagupta wrote:

~snip~

I recommend you start snipping posts. It cuts the length and makes it easier to navigate the topic. It is quite simple, all you have to do is cut most of the text of a post you're quoting and replace it with ‘snip’

edit: 700th post :o

The way I do it is use a “snip banner” that I have created and use that instead.

ContourLines wrote:

miagupta wrote:

~snip~

I recommend you start snipping posts. It cuts the length and makes it easier to navigate the topic. It is quite simple, all you have to do is cut most of the text of a post you're quoting and replace it with ‘snip’

edit: 700th post :o

Ok

Username:miagupta
What type of thing do you need (e.g. Scratch or Art) (you can find all of our services here):Review Cause I ordered a week ago and was great!
Describe what you need created:a review of my new branch https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/discuss/topic/431927/
Deadline (please use dd/mm/yyyy):Soon not as long as last time
Do you want a specialist to complete your order:yes!
Have you read section 1 of the Terms and Conditions:Yup
Are you following the discussion:yes
Additional notes:coronavirus must leave earth even tho you should say COVID-19

Voxalice wrote:

Can I just have a test order in HTML/CSS/JS? I don't have much to do here otherwise.

Order Form
Username: LankyBox01
What type of thing do you need: HTML & CSS
Describe what you need created: A website that looks like this, include all the info from here.
Deadline: none
Do you want a specialist to complete your order: I would like Voxalice to complete my order
Have you read section 1 of the Terms and Conditions: Yup
Are you following the discussion: Yup
Additional notes: Yup
Yup
Yup
Yup

It's time to change the banner!

NLC_BC1_08 wrote:

Voxalice wrote:

Snip

That was one word out of hundreds. I thought the review was amazing and that he deserves to be specialist.
edit: 701st post and page king :O

Thanks for the compliment! I'm already a specialist at reviewing as I know my skills, so no worries ;) I'm as stupendous as writing as you are with coding.

LankyBox01 wrote:

Order Form
Username: LankyBox01
What type of thing do you need: HTML & CSS
Describe what you need created: A website that looks like this, include all the info from here.
Deadline: none
Do you want a specialist to complete your order: I would like Voxalice to complete my order
Have you read section 1 of the Terms and Conditions: Yup
Are you following the discussion: Yup
Additional notes: Yup
Yup
Yup
Yup

I'll add this order to the Unclaimed Orders Center until @Voxalice takes it, then.

LankyBox01 wrote:

It's time to change the banner!

We have our own living alarm now, folks. Time to change the banner, it is!

Voxalice wrote:

OOPS. That should be “improve,” improvise means to do something spontaneously with no prior practice

bananaandchoc1 wrote:

Nambaseking01 wrote:

-snipped review of Topaz Art-
The professionalism can definitely be improvised.
-snipperoo-
You need to be more professional and remain off-topic

Should they be ‘improved’ and ‘on-topic’?

Hmm… Thanks for reminding me, but unfortunately the customer has already read the review. But I'll keep your messages in mind for the future - please continue to give feedback on my mistakes if I make any.

ContourLines wrote:

miagupta wrote:

~snip~

I recommend you start snipping posts. It cuts the length and makes it easier to navigate the topic. It is quite simple, all you have to do is cut most of the text of a post you're quoting and replace it with ‘snip’

edit: 700th post :o

700 POSTS! :D :D :D

Catie623 wrote:

What type of services are you a specialist at (e.g. Scratch or Pixel Art) (can be more than one and anything you wish): Coding, reviews, art, and BBCode. Hippity hoppity this position is now my property
What type of services are you not a specialist at, but can complete in some occasions: I'm not great at banners but I'm also not terrible (though I can't do animated banners)
How much time have you been on Scratch: Over 4 and a half years
Are you following this discussion: yep!
Have you read section 2 of the Terms and Conditions: yep!
Show us examples of your creations: https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/projects/418195266/ , https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/projects/410422265/ , https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/projects/417644067/ , https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/projects/416297439/ , https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/projects/416477435/ , https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/projects/415513866/ , https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/projects/412016584/ , https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/projects/413731390/ , https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/projects/332339447/ , https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/projects/376411458/ (yes, this one is a platformer but it's more of a coding example for you i guess) , https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/projects/378569962/ , https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/projects/403138353/ , https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/projects/407347163/ , https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/projects/404450006/ , https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/projects/404830333/ , plus you can find a review from me in the comments here plus I did all of the BBCode for my shops, Lily's Art Shop and Willow Tree Shop
What is your nickname (optional): Lily
Would you like to be invited to our team member studio (https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/studios/27343764) (optional): yes, please.
Additional notes: Did I add enough examples?

Accepted!

Also, I hope you're being sarcastic with that last question. Most people give, like, one or two examples

Nambaseking01 wrote:

Snip

Yeah people can be over qualified for jobs. It happened to my dad multiple times. I have worked with her in two different shops and she is a great worker and you would be stupid not to hire her. She would benefit this shop greatly and bring all of here beloved followers with her.

NLC_BC1_08 wrote:

Yeah people can be over qualified for jobs. It happened to my dad multiple times. I have worked with here in two different shops and she is a great worker and you would be stupid not to hire her. She would benefit this shop greatly and bring all of here beloved followers with her.

Haha, I'm aware, I've noticed many contributions by Lily ^^

Nambaseking01 wrote:

Snip

Many is an understatement. ha ha lol

NLC_BC1_08 wrote:

Nambaseking01 wrote:

Snip

Many is an understatement. ha ha lol

lol

Anyways, we can continue praising Lily and the other team members in the team member studio as it is slightly off-topic but for now let's just do some work. I need to finish writing today's poll results and implement (or not implement) the suggestions studio.

A studio for giving suggestions for this shop…? Ah, the irony - these poll results are for announcing whether they get implemented - and now we're doing a poll for making a studio where people should suggest stuff and not allow it anymore in the forum thread. Of course, if this gets implemented, it will be quite an interesting and organized change to Longarms, but today's poll is very, very, interesting and we might not know what to do. A lot of people are going to be quite shocked when seeing the results, and you'll know what I mean very soon.

Results
Yes, it would keep things much cleaner and understandable - people would know where to do what and it would be easier to collect suggestions. - 37.50%
Nah, we can just do it on the forum topic, seems like a waste of time to make a studio for this. - 37.50%
I don't know, both of the options seem reasonable… - 25.00%
I don't care, lol, you can do what you wish– *time to go back to gaming* - 0.00%

Did anybody notice? Anybody? We have a tie between the first two options! Both of them are 37.50%, but the exact number will not be revealed. Due to this, it is unsure what will be done in tie polls, but there's an idea with this sort of things. If there's a tie in the Poll Jumble, we'll have to redo the poll and put it at the last deadline possible - that way there's much more time for votes and decisions and lower chance of a tie appearing again. But anyways, this poll was pretty interesting!

I'll see you the day after tomorrow with another poll announcing something new!

Nambaseking01 (Nammy)
Founder & President of Longarms Creations
Founder & Former President of the Scratch Ultimate Coding Shop

Nambaseking01 wrote:

If there's a tie in the Poll Jumble, we'll have to redo the poll and put it at the last deadline possible - that way there's much more time for votes and decisions and lower chance of a tie appearing again. But anyways, this poll was pretty interesting!

there would be a lower chance if the results weren't biased. Because everyone who voted has already voted, they now have a bias towards that decision so next time they are more likely to vote for the same thing. Hence, the chance cannot be calculated without knowing the chances of every individual voting for a candidate.

ipaddude wrote:

Nambaseking01 wrote:

If there's a tie in the Poll Jumble, we'll have to redo the poll and put it at the last deadline possible - that way there's much more time for votes and decisions and lower chance of a tie appearing again. But anyways, this poll was pretty interesting!

there would be a lower chance if the results weren't biased. Because everyone who voted has already voted, they now have a bias towards that decision so next time they are more likely to vote for the same thing. Hence, the chance cannot be calculated without knowing the chances of every individual voting for a candidate.

That's very true. Instead, you can change the option's wordings to see if the original results were biased.